The new Auckland Super City needs to be big bold and significant, with the Rugby World Cup The New Auckland Super City will be Centre stage.
Radical Changes that were attempted to be included in the Plan would set a good message about New Zealand and have huge flow on effects.
The Recent coverage on Smoking shows people want change and reform.
Advertising and Places you can smoke are a huge issue.
Recently a Bill went to Council to Ban Smoking from Queen Street but was voted down by the ruling C&R and the Chair Cr. Aaron Bhatnager, he didnt want to Police the Policy.
Not long after Christchurch introduced a New Policy, No Smoking at Parks - The coverage is more towards playground and local area parks that generally have children playing in them. It a Dynamic Local effort where Local members have a part to help contain the policy. An excellent idea, Auckland has the capacity to do this through the Ambassador Network.
Auckland only needs to focus for the Main Street Queen Street, and would provide areas, it keeps it away from our Store Face, Retailers would applaud the idea of not having people smoke at the front of their Queen Street Boutique.
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Working Group Conclusion Disappointing
The Conclusion of the Govt. Finance Working Groups is well rather disappointing. It was not Ambitious, and it was not Change.
This National Govt. is not in threat of becoming a Centre Right Party, but a Liberal, Social, Fascist. Party. Why? Because they are kid gloves, stupid liberal, they are in active, and to pay a lrage amount to have Members discuss our Tax, and Closing the Gap with Australia to deliver what they did is Scary.
Don Brash said get rid of the Minimum Wage, So Pay everyone what? $7 p/h? And he wanted to lower taxes for the Companies and High Income Earners.
The Tax Working Group, says Land Tax, Raise GST to 15%, Tax Cuts for High Income, and recycled money and tax cuts for the low income earners. Again I am agaisnt Recycled Money, Why should you Tax a Worker, then maybe lower their tax rate slightly, and give them some assistance - but they collective amount still be much less than the entire amount you are taxed: This cannot be right - I have a better solution dont take any of my money, and I just pay the full amount for stuff as I need it, and I dont get the assistance from the Govt. because obviously I wont need it, and that option is not attractive enough.
I am very disappointed with the outcome, they have not done anything for the people that matter. A much fair option is the Republican Model, Fair Tax and True Republican Values of No Tax and Aspiration. Mike Huckabee has a Model that Countries should take Seriously.
Tax Consumption end not Productive. I think a Conservative Party would have said here is a model that is in America, Fair Tax - Its not a Flat Tax, but it is a Single Tax and its Fair to all Consumers. The only way to move forward is to get my money into the pockets of consumers, better social condtions, savings and robust networks.
It has been proven that when you lower the Tax on Production, you actually increase Govt. Coffers Income. A rise in GST and a Significant cut in Production, a Low income could go from, 21% to 8-12%, with a rise in GST to 15-17% - From 17% you coul go to 19-20% and have a Tax Free Income Base.
For the Finance Working Groups to not come up with big bold plans is a waste of time, they dont have any options so they are also in a bad position. We will see where we go with this story.
This National Govt. is not in threat of becoming a Centre Right Party, but a Liberal, Social, Fascist. Party. Why? Because they are kid gloves, stupid liberal, they are in active, and to pay a lrage amount to have Members discuss our Tax, and Closing the Gap with Australia to deliver what they did is Scary.
Don Brash said get rid of the Minimum Wage, So Pay everyone what? $7 p/h? And he wanted to lower taxes for the Companies and High Income Earners.
The Tax Working Group, says Land Tax, Raise GST to 15%, Tax Cuts for High Income, and recycled money and tax cuts for the low income earners. Again I am agaisnt Recycled Money, Why should you Tax a Worker, then maybe lower their tax rate slightly, and give them some assistance - but they collective amount still be much less than the entire amount you are taxed: This cannot be right - I have a better solution dont take any of my money, and I just pay the full amount for stuff as I need it, and I dont get the assistance from the Govt. because obviously I wont need it, and that option is not attractive enough.
I am very disappointed with the outcome, they have not done anything for the people that matter. A much fair option is the Republican Model, Fair Tax and True Republican Values of No Tax and Aspiration. Mike Huckabee has a Model that Countries should take Seriously.
Tax Consumption end not Productive. I think a Conservative Party would have said here is a model that is in America, Fair Tax - Its not a Flat Tax, but it is a Single Tax and its Fair to all Consumers. The only way to move forward is to get my money into the pockets of consumers, better social condtions, savings and robust networks.
It has been proven that when you lower the Tax on Production, you actually increase Govt. Coffers Income. A rise in GST and a Significant cut in Production, a Low income could go from, 21% to 8-12%, with a rise in GST to 15-17% - From 17% you coul go to 19-20% and have a Tax Free Income Base.
For the Finance Working Groups to not come up with big bold plans is a waste of time, they dont have any options so they are also in a bad position. We will see where we go with this story.
Monday, January 25, 2010
Banks blames Everyone Else:
John Banks has spent the last couple of days, pointing his finger playing the blame game, The first pointing came on the weekend, when the Herald reported that Several Super Yachts have been sent away from Auckland and NZ because Auckland as the City of Sails, 0f City of Fails - are unable to accommodate them.
Banks didnt really point blame at anyone, but just said that the new Super City will be World Class City with Vision blah blah, basically its the New Cities problem: But I will make it even bigger by holding up any Development that would help this issue, by putting barriers infron of the Government instead of getting them to sort out the Car Park on the wharf that wants to be an Open Space in time for the Rugby World Cup nect Year.
The most recent blame game come this afternoon, when Traffic Lights across Auckland went Down, and Trust Power shut down Power to consumers across Waikato and Northland:
Banksie in true form wasted no time to jump on the blame game and capitalise on this sorry state of Auckland Power Affairs. I dont really think finger pointing is the way forward, and its a bit rich that Auckland has something to say, why dont you fix the problem on your own soil: C&R ho now controls the Auckladn Energy Trust should do something, ok they are the lines Company but lets not get political, do your job:
The last thing we need is John Banks pointing the finger at everyone else, and writing up a list of issues that he was unable to fix now as Mayor of ACC - he should be worried about getting his own state of affairs up to par, rather then Claiming the Super Mayor before his time.
I would have liked it if he took on hand what the situation and look to provide solutions to deal with these issues, pointing the finger does very little.
Banks didnt really point blame at anyone, but just said that the new Super City will be World Class City with Vision blah blah, basically its the New Cities problem: But I will make it even bigger by holding up any Development that would help this issue, by putting barriers infron of the Government instead of getting them to sort out the Car Park on the wharf that wants to be an Open Space in time for the Rugby World Cup nect Year.
The most recent blame game come this afternoon, when Traffic Lights across Auckland went Down, and Trust Power shut down Power to consumers across Waikato and Northland:
Banksie in true form wasted no time to jump on the blame game and capitalise on this sorry state of Auckland Power Affairs. I dont really think finger pointing is the way forward, and its a bit rich that Auckland has something to say, why dont you fix the problem on your own soil: C&R ho now controls the Auckladn Energy Trust should do something, ok they are the lines Company but lets not get political, do your job:
The last thing we need is John Banks pointing the finger at everyone else, and writing up a list of issues that he was unable to fix now as Mayor of ACC - he should be worried about getting his own state of affairs up to par, rather then Claiming the Super Mayor before his time.
I would have liked it if he took on hand what the situation and look to provide solutions to deal with these issues, pointing the finger does very little.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Dynamic Social Services
Another big issue for my Campaign this Year is going to be the issue around Social Services, how far, from where and how much does a Local Government get involved. This is a Central Service, but at some times, different places and circumstances it may make better sense if some of the Delivery or Operation of these Services are better used as a Dynamic Balance Between the Social Welfare System and the Local Government rather than the Central Government. This may be where the Local Council may be in a better place to know of the situation and circumstances surrounding the parties involved rather than an Office in Wellington away from the area.
A Balance could be found, and I would be in favor for the Council to look into finding what the balance may look like. At a minimum I would also be keen to see the Local Council and The Welfare System working much closer together anyway. This can be a new way and area for the Council to look at ways to update and make systems more efficient, and looking for different partners to deliver services.
Better co ordination and networking between Central, Local and Welfare Services - can help deliver better outcomes.
A Balance could be found, and I would be in favor for the Council to look into finding what the balance may look like. At a minimum I would also be keen to see the Local Council and The Welfare System working much closer together anyway. This can be a new way and area for the Council to look at ways to update and make systems more efficient, and looking for different partners to deliver services.
Better co ordination and networking between Central, Local and Welfare Services - can help deliver better outcomes.
Community Art Centre
As part of my campaign for Council this year, I am going to focus alot of attention on the So Called Community Art Centre in Glen Innes Town: The Centre has been voted down for the past 10-15 or more years; This Critical Local Meeting Point has been a plan in the mix for a very long time, The Local Marae is also keen to get the ball rolling and has also submitted plans that involved re building the Marae and having a one stop shop for Arts and Social Services.
Cr. Aaron Bhatnager of the C & R, as Chair of the Financial Wing for ACC has always set the agenda to ensure that is was voted down over the past two cycles, and it has been placed and kept on the put off til later list.
This can keep happening, this building and resource centre is too important for a Community such as Glen Innes and the wider area. The rewards and financial benefits that it can bring to the community are vast, crime will lower and education levels will raise, training opportunities will rise, as such economic benefits will rise in the area. Rate Payers, should also note that such Development will help to raise the social economic status of the area, by Developing New Dynamic Buildings and Work Spaces has an on going spill off effect into surrounding areas, increasing property values, morale and economic activity in the area.
A vote for C&R will be a vote to take more money away from the South East Electorate and into the pockets for Remuera Foot Paths, while the hard workers slave in Onehunga, Panmure, Gi: And a vote for Labour Vision will be a status quo as their poor policy and networking skills will mean they will be able to come up with any good working policy for the electorate and achieve nothing.
Independent Candidates are accountable to the people not to a party.
Cr. Aaron Bhatnager of the C & R, as Chair of the Financial Wing for ACC has always set the agenda to ensure that is was voted down over the past two cycles, and it has been placed and kept on the put off til later list.
This can keep happening, this building and resource centre is too important for a Community such as Glen Innes and the wider area. The rewards and financial benefits that it can bring to the community are vast, crime will lower and education levels will raise, training opportunities will rise, as such economic benefits will rise in the area. Rate Payers, should also note that such Development will help to raise the social economic status of the area, by Developing New Dynamic Buildings and Work Spaces has an on going spill off effect into surrounding areas, increasing property values, morale and economic activity in the area.
A vote for C&R will be a vote to take more money away from the South East Electorate and into the pockets for Remuera Foot Paths, while the hard workers slave in Onehunga, Panmure, Gi: And a vote for Labour Vision will be a status quo as their poor policy and networking skills will mean they will be able to come up with any good working policy for the electorate and achieve nothing.
Independent Candidates are accountable to the people not to a party.
Monday, January 4, 2010
Quick Guide to Faking 9/11
I have to write this blog, because there are some stupid people in my network who still dont get 9/11 why it happened and why the tricked the world.
1. Pre Cursor to Terror Laws, and War on Terror.
2. Insurance Scam for the Buildings: - Mr Silverstein went to court to argue two separate acts of terror also, so twice the payout.
3. Insurance for the Planes.
4. Gold Storage under the Buildings
5. Put options that were placed on the Companies on the Stock Exchange.
6. The most important was to destroy all evidence, documents and case files that were being housed in the office of the FBI and Commerce Department in related Building 7 - Which to this day has not been given sufficient evidence as to how those buildings were destroyed.
How: Over many long hours and months they applied Explosive Paint and Explosive Devices across the building.
They then used a collection of animation, and camera trickery to stage the show: Using Loud Speakers and Sound Effects to give the illusion of a plane, neat camera tricks and drone airplane to simulate the attack:
The Drone Planes can then be filled in later with actual footage of a plane or near enough: The great thing about a drone plane is they are much cheaper than an actual plane but can do all the same things of one.
I am not going to get into anymore detail than this, but if I do see need then I will: But you might like to start by looking here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM
1. Pre Cursor to Terror Laws, and War on Terror.
2. Insurance Scam for the Buildings: - Mr Silverstein went to court to argue two separate acts of terror also, so twice the payout.
3. Insurance for the Planes.
4. Gold Storage under the Buildings
5. Put options that were placed on the Companies on the Stock Exchange.
6. The most important was to destroy all evidence, documents and case files that were being housed in the office of the FBI and Commerce Department in related Building 7 - Which to this day has not been given sufficient evidence as to how those buildings were destroyed.
How: Over many long hours and months they applied Explosive Paint and Explosive Devices across the building.
They then used a collection of animation, and camera trickery to stage the show: Using Loud Speakers and Sound Effects to give the illusion of a plane, neat camera tricks and drone airplane to simulate the attack:
The Drone Planes can then be filled in later with actual footage of a plane or near enough: The great thing about a drone plane is they are much cheaper than an actual plane but can do all the same things of one.
I am not going to get into anymore detail than this, but if I do see need then I will: But you might like to start by looking here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM
Friday, January 1, 2010
Leaky Homes
This is not going away it is such a scandal, why should the Good Residents of South Auckland pay for the debt of other areas, when this area alone managed too with all things against them - Build Homes that dont leak.
Where as all other areas, Mainly East, North, Central - build Homes that leak.
The real Problem I have is that I dont want Central to pay for it as its a Local Problem, but its not a problem where its not a problem, so really its your own problem, there fore if you are in that situation, then steps need to be taken by your self to fix that.
It needs to go on a case by case scenario and it has to come more local: It should only come form the Local Budget, ie East Auckland Only, Central Only and North Only, so the problem must be sorted out at the most local area - but on the whole area.
You could then take a percentage per state capita from the central budget. This might take longer but, by not making it more harder on People not in that situation, you are enabling areas to profit accordingly: And it would not just be a matter of being able to move to another area: As the problem only effects owners of the Homes, so either way it passes through you or not. And other Neighbor hoods would be able to continue to grow the economy.
Rental Prices are going to rise more, My rent has increased this year: I expect that to stay the same for the next year or two. -
Where as all other areas, Mainly East, North, Central - build Homes that leak.
The real Problem I have is that I dont want Central to pay for it as its a Local Problem, but its not a problem where its not a problem, so really its your own problem, there fore if you are in that situation, then steps need to be taken by your self to fix that.
It needs to go on a case by case scenario and it has to come more local: It should only come form the Local Budget, ie East Auckland Only, Central Only and North Only, so the problem must be sorted out at the most local area - but on the whole area.
You could then take a percentage per state capita from the central budget. This might take longer but, by not making it more harder on People not in that situation, you are enabling areas to profit accordingly: And it would not just be a matter of being able to move to another area: As the problem only effects owners of the Homes, so either way it passes through you or not. And other Neighbor hoods would be able to continue to grow the economy.
Rental Prices are going to rise more, My rent has increased this year: I expect that to stay the same for the next year or two. -
Thank God thats Over now for Next Year.
Self Explanatory really, well into next year:
The talk has been next year for the past year. Its already the end of the year, with local elections this year. As I have said I will be running as an Independent.
I hope to spread a good distinct Neo Conservative, Social Democrat point of view. I hope to touch base with Independents, Social Democrats, Democrats, Left Wing, Right Wing, Moderates and Conservatives.
My views will be focusing around the Leaky Homes Fiasco, and the Shame of this Administration to put your Council into such a mess.
I will ensure better systems and methods: And I wont put your future, or the Council of your Children and Grand Children to carry this debt.
The talk has been next year for the past year. Its already the end of the year, with local elections this year. As I have said I will be running as an Independent.
I hope to spread a good distinct Neo Conservative, Social Democrat point of view. I hope to touch base with Independents, Social Democrats, Democrats, Left Wing, Right Wing, Moderates and Conservatives.
My views will be focusing around the Leaky Homes Fiasco, and the Shame of this Administration to put your Council into such a mess.
I will ensure better systems and methods: And I wont put your future, or the Council of your Children and Grand Children to carry this debt.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)